NEWS

Nawaz Sharif Ousted: How The Global Media Reacted

A day after Pakistan's Supreme Court declaring Nawaz Sharif disqualified for being "dishonest" in his decision in Panamgate, global media came out with mixed reactions about political unrest in South Asian country on Saturday.

Whenever the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) submitted its report to the Supreme Court on July 10, both national and international media had estimated the fate of Nawaz Sharif and his family.

Some reactions have been published in the media around the world.

In an editorial, the Guardian said that although the court's decision "leaves Pakistan's politics in turmoil, this (Panama papers) is a very international relationship ... efforts should not be stopped there. For the beneficial owners of UK companies The public register must be extended to the British tax haven, it is necessary to include trusts in it, and a proper means of testing it should be presented. Hia. Should be independent accountability leaks, although this time they have proved effective. "

In an essay-ed article titled "The Court of Sets a Dangerous Missentent of Pakistan", The New York Times said that "the decision has not been surprising, even though Shirif was not kept in the Panama Leak, and there is no evidence That he misbehaved the public office for personal gain, the judges declared it ineligible to hide the property, and therefore, not "honest" (...) Pakistani politicians Is not the voice of truth, but corruption is not the main cause of decent situation (...) judges have to remove the Sharif without clear process or reduce the perception of justice in an attempt to prove his innocence. "

Hindustan Times, "Nawaz Sharif's sentence leaves a political vacuum in Pakistan, this is not a good news for India", said that almost departure from Sharif's "political scenario" about the period of instability within Pakistan And therefore, greater risk in relations between India and Pakistan "

Bloomberg said in a session-ed in "Pakistan's politics Fell Ando", "No one should be above the law, but the circumstances surrounding justice are troubling ... Pakistan's courts do not work as voters. Use more resources and more independence, but politicians should solve their political differences in Parliament and through ballot box. Right might work, but it is no way to Pakistan.

On a pledge on Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan, while announcing the Times of India in an op-ed titled "India Today Close Watch" as a decision to keep Pakistan in a flight, said, "(Indian) government is silent, Even this "internal matter", which is a stock reaction by the Foreign Ministry, but the displeasure of the Pakistani leader is not surprising for the South Block.

"The possibility of deepening political instability in Pakistan can not be ruled out and if this happens then India will hold a more defensive post."

In an editorial, "The democratic norms in Pakistan will be strengthened by removing Nawaz Sharif," he said: "It is very unfortunate for the people of Pakistan that any Prime Minister of their country has ever completed a five-year term This decision has not been done, but the way to strengthen the democratic norms in the country and to run the state for honest politicians and officials. Sharif has also responded wisely by announcing his removal from the post before the Election Commission had issued a notification to remove him from his post. After the court's decision. "

: En: IANS